Intrapreneurship at Scale: How I Launched Four Internal Startups and Secured Corporate Funding

There’s a question I’ve been asked more than once about intrapreneurship programmes: do they actually produce anything real, or are they mostly an engagement exercise with a startup aesthetic?

My answer is that it depends almost entirely on how they’re designed and who’s leading them. Done well, they produce real products, real revenue, and real cultural change. Done as a box-ticking exercise, they produce branded hoodies and a lot of post-it notes.

What I built was the real version.

The Programme

As Site Lead for an Intrapreneurship team operating under the Chief Innovation Officer, I designed and led a programme whose explicit goal was to identify, fund, and scale new business ventures from within the organisation. Not idea management. Not hackathons. Actual ventures โ€” with dedicated teams, product roadmaps, go-to-market strategies, and accountability for outcomes.

I drove innovation identification, assembled teams, developed strategy, led GTM planning, and built the scaling infrastructure for ventures that had passed initial validation. The programme operated with the structure of a startup accelerator but with internal talent and a corporate backer willing to place genuine bets.

The Outcomes

Over the course of the programme, I launched four internal startups and secured double dight millions in corporate funding to back them. These weren’t unfunded pilot projects kept alive by borrowed team time. They were resourced, intentional ventures with leadership sponsorship and measurable milestones.

This sits alongside the broader Intrapreneurship & Startup School I built at SAP Labs India โ€” engaging 12,000+ participants over multiple years, with a dedicated team and a network of over 200 internal and external mentors and experts. The school was the talent pipeline. The accelerator was where the most promising ideas went to become something real.

What Made It Work

A few things made this version of intrapreneurship different from programmes that produce presentations but not products. First, executive sponsorship with genuine authority โ€” not just visibility. Second, selection criteria focused on customer problems we’d already validated, not technologies we wanted to explore. Third, a willingness to staff ventures with the organisation’s best people, not whoever was available.

Intrapreneurship fails most often not because the ideas are bad, but because the organisation treats it as an extracurricular activity while the real work happens elsewhere. The ventures that emerged from this programme succeeded because they were treated as real work โ€” because I led them that way.


What ideas in your organisation are waiting for someone to take them seriously enough to staff and fund them properly?

Let’s keep learning โ€” together.

Share your thoughts

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑